Who Knows Where or When?
I frequently critique book ideas of people whom I mentor, and sometimes co-write books, in addition to my personal publishing. The early conversations often go like this:
Them: “I want to write a book about the importance of execution.”
Me: “The prospective readers already know the importance.”
Them: “Well, I’ll write about how to execute better.”
Me: “They know that, too.”
Them: “Then what should I write about?”
Me: “The discipline and accountability of execution.”
I’ve found that most senior managers (and, for that matter, most people), know why something is important. If they don’t, then some awareness heightening is needed. They also know what to do about it. If not, they need to be exposed to options. They additionally know how to do it, in most circumstances. If they don’t or they can’t, then some skills training or coaching or experiences will take care of it.
But what people lack these days in the impetus, urgency, and rigor to actually put what they know into action. They claim combatting priorities, lack of time, disorganization, and so forth. But the reality is that the difference between getting something changed and not getting something changed is focus and discipline. These two traits seem to require exequies these days.
People have the tools to paint the garage or to find a painter to do it, but the job goes undone until the home owners’ association threatens to condemn the property. Why? Because we just “never get around to it.”
The company needs to change its brand, or enter a new market, or revamp the compensation system. There are enough smart people around, either internally or externally, to make those changes. But there is no champion, no special incentive or reward, and no real pressure to make it happen. Habitually, executives assign tasks but not accountability.
The last time I looked, over $62 billion was spend annually in the U.S. on training programs by corporate America (source: American Society for Training & Development). Yet virtually none of it was measured for effectiveness or return on investment. That’s because no one wants to know. Not the firms which don’t have the rigor to turn the training event into behavior change on the job. Not the training firms, selling boxes and software and workshops that are highly profitable and without any metrics at all in most cases. Not the participants, who are merely getting their “ticket stamped” on the way to being promoted or at least left alone by management.
Discipline requires these elements:
• Clarity of purpose and results intended.
• Metrics for success.
• Accountability to others who frequently review your progress.
• Tools and authority to overcome obstacles and resistance.
• Reward and recognition, even if self-imposed.
My dog, Koufax, apparently holds himself accountable to clear the yard of squirrels when he’s out there. He’s clear on what needs to be done; considers himself successful when the yard is rodent-free; possesses the requisite speed and ferocity; and is quite pleased with himself after a few minutes of work, after which he lies in the shade.
Whether yourself or your clients, it’s surprising how frequently the value isn’t in “how” but rather in “Here’s the deadline, don’t let us down.”
© Alan Weiss 2011. All rights reserved.
Mark Kyte
Great article! I think it’s the accountability that many people struggle with, but like you say above, it is crucial.
Volkmar Voelzke
Great post. Your stated issues are the same that I observe frequently.
On top, a culture of discipline and accountability works better in an environment of passion and inspiration. It is easier to go for the next (sometimes tough) steps during strategy execution if people are emotionally committed, believing that the change is the best that can happen to them and the organization.
I see that this inspirational level is by far too low in many corporations. Bored people are seldom disciplined — at least not in the positive sense.
Alan Weiss
It’s not so much execution as resolution.
Rick Abbott
Alan- Excellent. Every IT executive should read this, it highlights the biggest problem with IT organizations today (lack of accountability and focus).
Alan Weiss
I find that IT people—and I admit this is a generalization—complain mightily about their lot, but when I suggest how to improve things they respond without so much as a second of thought, “That would never work.”
Dan Weedin
Thanks for the post, Alan. This is just what I needed as I start working on my book proposal. I’ve printed it out to keep handy as a guide as I go through this. Thanks for the clarity.
Darren
“• Accountability to others who frequently review your progress.”
I think this bullet is most lacking. Perhaps managers don’t want to feel like they’re micro-managing?
For me, having clear expectations and deadlines would help me to focus.
Alan Weiss
Micro-managing is telling you what to do at each step, making your decisions for you. Accountability is about reviewing your decisions and progress to ensure you’re where you should be. Otherwise, why do we need management?